Article

How India's Education Leaders Are Adapting to AI | Woolf

Higher education leaders from India discuss how AI is reshaping teaching, learning, and academic quality—without losing human connection or global degree recognition.

By Anna Meshcherova
ArticleJanuary 8, 2026

How Education Leaders Are Adapting to AI Without Losing the Human Core

Artificial intelligence is no longer a future consideration for higher education. It is a present reality—reshaping how institutions design curriculum, assess learning, support faculty, and prepare students for a rapidly evolving workforce.

In Woolf’s recent webinar, How India’s Education Leaders Are Adapting to AI, a distinguished panel came together to explore a shared challenge: how to move quickly with AI while preserving academic quality, human connection, and long-term institutional credibility.

The conversation featured:

  • Dr. S. Sadagopan, Founding Director, IIIT Bangalore
  • Dr. Pramath Raj Sinha, Founding Dean, Indian School of Business; Founder, Harappa Education
  • Abhimanyu Saxena, CEO, Scaler
  • Dr. Marten Kringsman, Director of Strategic Licensing at Woolf
  • Lexie Kadlec, Head of Partnerships at Woolf

Despite representing different institutional models, the panelists expressed striking alignment on first principles.

AI Is an Accelerator, Not a Substitute for Education

One of the clearest themes across the discussion was a rejection of “AI as replacement” narratives.

As Prof. Sadagopan put it, “Education has always evolved with technology. What matters is whether we use it to deepen learning—or to shortcut it.” AI, he argued, must strengthen academic intent, not weaken it.

Abhinmanyu, CEO of Scaler, echoed this view from an applied learning perspective: “AI helps us scale feedback, personalize learning, and support instructors—but the learning still happens between people.”

Across the panel, AI was consistently framed as a tool for:

  • Personalizing learning pathways
  • Supporting faculty with content creation and assessment
  • Reducing administrative load so educators can focus on teaching

But as Dr. Marten Kringsman emphasized, “Technology can accelerate processes, but it cannot define academic standards. That responsibility remains human.”

The Pace of Technology Will Always Outrun Policy

Another recurring insight was the growing gap between the speed of AI innovation and the pace of regulation and policy.

Pramath Raj Sinha captured this tension directly: “If institutions wait for perfect regulatory clarity, they will never move. The question is how to experiment responsibly.”

Rather than waiting, panelists advocated for:

  • Clear academic principles as non-negotiables
  • Controlled pilots within defined guardrails
  • Continuous iteration based on evidence

Dr. Kringsman reinforced the importance of structure, noting that “innovation without a framework creates risk; innovation within a recognized academic system creates trust.”

This balance—movement without recklessness—was a defining thread of the conversation.

AI Literacy Is Becoming a Core Graduate Skill

The discussion also turned toward learners and the changing expectations placed on graduates.

Abhinmanyu noted that AI literacy is no longer optional: “Our students don’t need to become AI engineers, but they do need to understand how these tools shape their work and decisions.”

Panelists agreed that AI literacy now includes:

  • Conceptual understanding of AI systems
  • Ethical and critical use
  • Collaboration in AI-augmented environments

As Prof. Sadagopan observed, “Literacy has always evolved—from reading and writing to digital fluency. AI literacy is simply the next step.”

Importantly, speakers stressed that AI literacy must be embedded into curricula intentionally, aligned with learning outcomes and assessment standards, not treated as a bolt-on skill.

Human Connection Remains Central to Learning

Despite the focus on advanced technology, the most consistent theme throughout the webinar was deeply human.

Pramath Raj Sinha emphasized that “education is fundamentally a social process. AI should give faculty more time for mentorship, not less.”

Panelists returned repeatedly to the importance of:

  • Faculty-student relationships
  • Peer learning communities
  • Dialogue, reflection, and judgment

As Dr. Kringsman noted, “The more automated parts of education become, the more valuable human interaction becomes.”

Institutions seeing the strongest outcomes, the panel agreed, are using AI to create space for connection, not eliminate it.

Degrees, Credibility, and Long-Term Recognition Still Matter

The conversation also addressed a growing tension in global education: skills versus credentials.

While skills-based hiring is reshaping entry-level opportunities, panelists cautioned against assuming degrees no longer matter.

Prof. Sadagopan was direct: “Skills may get someone hired once. Degrees help them build a career over decades.”

Learners need credentials that are:

  • Recognized across borders
  • Interpretable by employers and institutions
  • Durable as careers evolve

This is where accredited degree programs within globally recognized systems—such as those aligned with the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS)—continue to play a critical role.

As the panel made clear, skills create momentum—but recognized degrees preserve it.

What This Means for Education Leaders

Taken together, the webinar offered a grounded but optimistic view of higher education’s future.

AI is not a silver bullet. It introduces new risks and responsibilities. But when guided by strong academic frameworks and a commitment to human-centered learning, it can be a powerful catalyst for improvement.

The institutions best positioned for this next era are not chasing every new tool. They are asking better questions:

  • Where does AI genuinely improve learning quality?
  • How do we preserve trust and recognition while innovating?
  • How do we prepare learners for change without anchoring them to transient technologies?

At Woolf, these questions sit at the heart of our global collegiate model—supporting member colleges as they innovate responsibly within internationally recognized academic standards.

The conversation is far from over. But one thing is clear: the future of higher education will be shaped not by perfect systems, but by principled leadership willing to learn while doing.

Continue the Conversation With Woolf

If your institution is exploring how to integrate AI while maintaining academic quality, global recognition, and long-term credibility, Woolf can help.

Woolf works with education providers to:

  • Offer accredited degree programs within a global collegiate university
  • Navigate compliance and quality assurance with confidence
  • Innovate responsibly within internationally recognized frameworks

Schedule a consultation with Woolf.

We’d welcome the opportunity to learn more about your goals and explore whether Woolf is the right partner for your next stage of growth.

Black background with a subtle repeating pattern of intertwined letters resembling 'W' and 'M'.

You might like these other news articles

Article

Scaling Education in a New Era of Growth | Woolf

All
By Anna Meshcherova
Article

Udacity and Woolf: Expanding Access to Accredited, Affordable Degrees

All
By Anna Meshcherova
Article

Udacity Partners with Woolf to Launch a Fully Accredited Master’s in Artificial Intelligence

All
By Anna Meshcherova
Chat

Woolf founder and CEO Dr. Joshua Broggi host an Ask Me Anything series for prospective students

All
By Woolf Team